Pension arrangements and economic thinking: unreal assumptions and false predictions in the case of Argentina

Vista sencilla de ítem
cepal.articleNo6
cepal.bibLevelSección o Parte de un Documento
cepal.callNumberLC/PUB.2022/5-P
cepal.docTypeRevistas
cepal.jelCodeH55
cepal.jelCodeI38
cepal.jelCodeJ26
cepal.jobNumberRVI136_Geri
cepal.physicalDescriptiongráficos., tablas.
cepal.regionalOfficeSantiago
cepal.sdg1
cepal.topicEngSOCIAL PROTECTION
cepal.topicEngSOCIAL RIGHTS
cepal.topicEngPENSIONS
cepal.topicSpaDERECHOS SOCIALES
cepal.topicSpaPROTECCIÓN SOCIAL
cepal.topicSpaPENSIONES
cepal.workareaEngECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
cepal.workareaSpaDESARROLLO ECONÓMICO
dc.contributor.authorGeri, Milva
dc.coverage.spatialEngARGENTINA
dc.coverage.spatialSpaARGENTINA
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-05T01:15:43Z
dc.date.available2022-08-05T01:15:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-04
dc.description.abstractIn accordance with mainstream economic thinking, the World Bank advised Latin American countries to reform and fully or partially privatize their pension systems. Argentina was one of the countries to follow these recommendations, which it did without first checking whether the arguments were valid or whether the theoretical assumptions were fulfilled. On the basis of publicly available statistical information and a historical review of the Argentine pension system, we conclude that most of the arguments put forward by the World Bank were refutable at the time of the reform, which did not solve the problems it set out to address. For this reason, decision-makers should heed the economic history of each country before following the recommendations of international organizations.
dc.formatTexto
dc.format.extentpáginas. 111-12
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.unSymbolLC/PUB.2022/5-P
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11362/48043
dc.language.isoeng
dc.physicalDescriptionp. 111-126: gráfs., tabls.
dc.relation.isPartOfCEPAL Review
dc.relation.isPartOfSeriesCEPAL Review
dc.relation.isPartOfSeriesNo136
dc.relation.translationLanguagespa
dc.relation.translationRecordSistema previsional y pensamiento económico: irrealidad de los supuestos y predicciones falsas en el caso de la Argentina
dc.relation.translationUrihttps://hdl.handle.net/11362/47863
dc.rights.coarDisponible
dc.subject.unbisEngSOCIAL SECURITY
dc.subject.unbisEngECONOMIC SYSTEMS
dc.subject.unbisEngINTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subject.unbisEngPENSIONS
dc.subject.unbisEngECONOMIC REFORM
dc.subject.unbisEngEQUALITY
dc.subject.unbisEngRETIREMENT
dc.subject.unbisEngRETIREMENT INCOME
dc.subject.unbisEngCASE STUDIES
dc.subject.unbisSpaSEGURIDAD SOCIAL
dc.subject.unbisSpaSISTEMAS ECONOMICOS
dc.subject.unbisSpaORGANIZACIONES INTERNACIONALES
dc.subject.unbisSpaPENSIONES
dc.subject.unbisSpaREFORMA ECONOMICA
dc.subject.unbisSpaIGUALDAD
dc.subject.unbisSpaJUBILACION
dc.subject.unbisSpaINGRESOS POR JUBILACION
dc.subject.unbisSpaESTUDIOS DE CASOS
dc.titlePension arrangements and economic thinking: unreal assumptions and false predictions in the case of Argentina
dc.type.coarrevista
dc.usergrouprevistacepal
Descargar
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
RVI136_Geri.pdf
Tamaño:
522.01 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Document in English
Descargar
Colecciones
Revista CEPAL